The Random Blog of Awesome
blanketforyourshock:

greencarnations:

oldauntamy:


A graphical representation of the contradictions in the bible. Each red line links 2 contradicting statements.

Everyone loves a good novel.

Guys, that is because the Bible is not actually one book. It’s lots of books of legends, laws, letters and stories from the same religion over a span of thousands of years. You’re not meant to read it like it’s one book by one guy.
Each separate book has to be taken in about fifty different contexts. You have to understand the book’s audience, the author’s intent, the translator’s intent, the publisher’s intent, the fact that there are words no one actually knows how to translate and so just guess wildly, your current cultural bias, the past cultural bias…and that’s just all I can think of off the top of my head.
Given all that, yeah, there’s some stuff said at one point that’s irrelevant later and needs changing. Think of a politician going back on positions he had earlier in his career and saying “yeah, some things happened, now I think x.”
One of the reasons the Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John: the story of Jesus) are so popular is how relatively accessible they are. They’re the easiest to read in a relatively straightforward manner, as Jesus and the apostles were the first guys to really take God to the masses in an approachable way.
He references back to Old Testament stuff pretty often because that’s what his audience knew and related to, but you can read it and understand it anyways. Kind of like reading the second Harry Potter but not the first, you can still understand and appreciate what’s happening without the entire context, though it certainly adds to the experience.
Don’t think of reading the Bible as A Song of Ice and Fire, where it’s one long, continuous story in which everything interconnects. It’s more like…Glee. A less shitty Glee. There’s continuity, but sometimes it gets smudged for the really important main messages. Sometimes those main messages shift and change a little as the audience does, but at its heart it’s still the same thing.
THROWS HANDS UP IN FRUSTRATION
EVERYONE IS GETTING RELIGION WRONG

THANK YOU

blanketforyourshock:

greencarnations:

oldauntamy:

A graphical representation of the contradictions in the bible. Each red line links 2 contradicting statements.

Everyone loves a good novel.

Guys, that is because the Bible is not actually one book. It’s lots of books of legends, laws, letters and stories from the same religion over a span of thousands of years. You’re not meant to read it like it’s one book by one guy.

Each separate book has to be taken in about fifty different contexts. You have to understand the book’s audience, the author’s intent, the translator’s intent, the publisher’s intent, the fact that there are words no one actually knows how to translate and so just guess wildly, your current cultural bias, the past cultural bias…and that’s just all I can think of off the top of my head.

Given all that, yeah, there’s some stuff said at one point that’s irrelevant later and needs changing. Think of a politician going back on positions he had earlier in his career and saying “yeah, some things happened, now I think x.”

One of the reasons the Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John: the story of Jesus) are so popular is how relatively accessible they are. They’re the easiest to read in a relatively straightforward manner, as Jesus and the apostles were the first guys to really take God to the masses in an approachable way.

He references back to Old Testament stuff pretty often because that’s what his audience knew and related to, but you can read it and understand it anyways. Kind of like reading the second Harry Potter but not the first, you can still understand and appreciate what’s happening without the entire context, though it certainly adds to the experience.

Don’t think of reading the Bible as A Song of Ice and Fire, where it’s one long, continuous story in which everything interconnects. It’s more like…Glee. A less shitty Glee. There’s continuity, but sometimes it gets smudged for the really important main messages. Sometimes those main messages shift and change a little as the audience does, but at its heart it’s still the same thing.

THROWS HANDS UP IN FRUSTRATION

EVERYONE IS GETTING RELIGION WRONG

THANK YOU

  1. livelaughlove1534 reblogged this from the-ghostbusters
  2. stormtide reblogged this from minccinorris
  3. all-thefandoms reblogged this from schmoopkip and added:
    i really kinda like that interpretation.
  4. silvarbelle reblogged this from castylist
  5. voyage-to-nowhere reblogged this from maths-sucks
  6. castylist reblogged this from america-the-bootyful
  7. heidigarner8 reblogged this from the-bob-loblaw-law-blawg
  8. happy-sailing reblogged this from mundanemerman
  9. limeylimelimen reblogged this from lost-tempo
  10. tonislikefiles reblogged this from oppositeofluck
  11. oppositeofluck reblogged this from the-ghostbusters
  12. av-oke reblogged this from faded-dreamsandnicotine
  13. insanity-is-key reblogged this from decodethefallenmoon
  14. faded-dreamsandnicotine reblogged this from decodethefallenmoon
  15. decodethefallenmoon reblogged this from naiveisnothermiddlename
  16. naiveisnothermiddlename reblogged this from 21stcenturyshowgirl
  17. larryplz reblogged this from modestlyhomo
  18. telling-flowers reblogged this from thatbitchwithweed
  19. buried-in-this-house reblogged this from merdedechat
  20. merdedechat reblogged this from miss-midna and added:
    Yeah, ditto. I’d like to see them too.
  21. starkstanding reblogged this from brokenfragilethings
  22. freakinbuttercupserket reblogged this from miss-midna
  23. not-like-others reblogged this from miss-midna
  24. miss-midna reblogged this from nykonykes
  25. fuckyoufuckyoufuuckyou reblogged this from kairros
  26. nykonykes reblogged this from the-ghostbusters and added:
    yeah but where can I actually see these contradictions? I’m not trying to argue against this, I’m legitly curious...
  27. xxm4rtianxxkidxx reblogged this from zombitcch
  28. molodoo reblogged this from gigacat and added:
    Headcanon accepted!
  29. finding-mine reblogged this from zombitcch